Friday, September 26, 2008

An Edublogger's Take on Standardized Tests

As research for my debate paper project in Professor Potter's class, I came across an educator's blog concerning his opinion about standardized tests. He is a high school teacher, but his position, location, and name remain unknown. I'm assuming this is the case because his post focused on providing reasons for being a standardized test supporter. I was immediately intrigued by his opening declaration, "“Let me come right out and say it….I am in favor of standardized testing in order for students to get their high school diploma." I was taken by this statement because the person's hesitation and seeming embarrassment about this assertion was pronounced even as text on a blog post. It was as if I could see his cheeks turning red. Regardless of my impression of this person or his opinion (wrong, he's wrong...) I was excited to find a blog that satisfied an assignment for two of my courses and one that related to my life. I even cared about what I was reading and felt some sort of emotion while learning! This man's argument is that we merely shuffle kids through school because we don't want to deal with them, or we give up on them because they are so behind. He asserts that because of our neglect as teachers, we aren't adequately preparing students to be beneficial citizens in society. In this case, I agree with anonymous blogger man. I feel bad for these kids. However, this is why we SMACers don't sleep and work extra hard in order to change the future in our own small, but significant way. So change on, colleagues. Keep kicking butt (and reminding me of assignment due dates)!

1 comment:

Jeff Stanzler said...

Two quick reactions, Bridget..
First, I'm glad that you were able to effectively find a path to meet a requirement for two classes in one stop.
Secondly, your mention of this posting whetted my appetite, but also raised some questions. I can certainly buy into his support for better preparing kids for their future, and not merely shuffling them along. I didn't see how he was associating the importance of this with his advocacy for standardized tests. I could guess that perhaps he is fairly confident that what is covered on a good standardized test is important enough, and is reflected well enough on a standardized test, that it provides a kind of check on the possibility that kids would otherwise be shuffled along, etc.
If you can, respond to this and add a link to this blog...